Search for: All records

Summary The evolutionary origins of the genetic point centromere in the brewer’s yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae,a member of the order Saccharomycetales, are still unknown. Competing hypotheses suggest that the point centromere tripartite genetic centromere DNA elements (CDEs) either evolved from ancestral epigenetic centromeres by descent with modification or were gained through horizontal transfer from selfish DNA plasmids.^1,2Here, we identified centromeres in the sister order Saccharomycodales and termed them “proto-point centromeres” due to sequence features that bridge the evolutionary gap between point centromeres and ancestral centromeres types. Comparative genomic analyses across multiple yeast orders showed an unexpected evolutionary link between point and proto-point centromeres to the long terminal repeats (LTRs) of Ty5 retrotransposons. Strikingly, one Saccharomycodales species,Saccharomycodes ludwigii, harbors compact Ty5-based centromeres, where its CDEII elements are divergent AT-rich Ty5 LTRs. These living fossil centromeres show how retrotransposon cis-regulation was likely co-opted for genetic centromere specification. These insights show that point centromeres are direct descendants of retrotransposons and have evolved by descent with modification. Ultimately, the many diverse centromere types across the yeast subphylum may share a common ancestry rooted in retrotransposon activity. 

Abstract Kinetochores assemble on centromeres to drive chromosome segregation in eukaryotic cells. Humans and budding yeast share most of the structural subunits of the kinetochore, whereas protein sequences have diverged considerably. The conserved centromeric histone H3 variant, CenH3 (CENP-A in humans and Cse4 in budding yeast), marks the site for kinetochore assembly in most species. A previous effort to complement Cse4 in yeast with human CENP-A was unsuccessful; however, co-complementation with the human core nucleosome was not attempted. Previously, our lab successfully humanized the core nucleosome in yeast; however, this severely affected cellular growth. We hypothesized that yeast Cse4 is incompatible with humanized nucleosomes and that the kinetochore represented a limiting factor for efficient histone humanization. Thus, we argued that including the human CENP-A or a Cse4–CENP-A chimera might improve histone humanization and facilitate kinetochore function in humanized yeast. The opposite was true: CENP-A expression reduced histone humanization efficiency, was toxic to yeast, and disrupted cell cycle progression and kinetochore function in wild-type (WT) cells. Suppressors of CENP-A toxicity included gene deletions of subunits of 3 conserved chromatin remodeling complexes, highlighting their role in CenH3 chromatin positioning. Finally, we attempted to complement the subunits of the NDC80 kinetochore complex, individually and in combination, without success, in contrast to a previous study indicating complementation by the human NDC80/HEC1 gene. Our results suggest that limited protein sequence similarity between yeast and human components in this very complex structure leads to failure of complementation. 

Abstract A novel budding yeast species was isolated from a soil sample collected in the United States of America. Phylogenetic analyses of multiple loci and phylogenomic analyses conclusively placed the species within the genusPichia. Strain yHMH446 falls within a clade that includesPichia norvegensis,Pichia pseudocactophila,Candida inconspicua, andPichia cactophila. Whole genome sequence data were analyzed for the presence of genes known to be important for carbon and nitrogen metabolism, and the phenotypic data from the novel species were compared to allPichiaspecies with publicly available genomes. Across the genus, including the novel species candidate, we found that the inability to use many carbon and nitrogen sources correlated with the absence of metabolic genes. Based on these results,Pichia galeolatasp. nov. is proposed to accommodate yHMH446^T(=NRRL Y‐64187 = CBS 16864). This study shows how integrated taxogenomic analysis can add mechanistic insight to species descriptions. 

Summary Eukaryotic DNA wraps around histone octamers forming nucleosomes, which modulate genome function by defining chromatin environments with distinct accessibility. These well-conserved properties allowed “humanization” of the nucleosome core particle (NCP) inSaccharomyces cerevisiaeat high fitness costs. Here we studied nucleosome-humanized yeast-genomes to understand how species-specific chromatin affects nuclear organization and function. We found a size increase in human-NCP, linked to shorter free linker DNA, supporting decreased chromatin accessibility. 3-D humanized-genome maps showed increased chromatin compaction and defective centromere clustering, correlated with high chromosomal aneuploidy rate. Site-specific chromatin alterations were associated with lack of initiation of early origins of replication and dysregulation of the ribosomal (rDNA and rRNA) metabolism. This latter led to nucleolar fragmentation and rDNA-array instability, through a non-coding RNA dependent mechanism, leading to its extraordinary, but entirely reversible, intra-chromosomal expansion. Overall, our results reveal species-specific properties of the NCP that define epigenome function across vast evolutionary distances. HighlightsHumanized nucleosomes wrap 10 additional nucleotides, shortening free linker lengthHistone-humanized nucleosomes have increased occupancy for DNAHumanized nucleosomes potentially decrease chromatin accessibility by blocking-out free linker DNANucleosome humanization impedes DNA replication by affecting chromatin structure at originsHumanized nucleosomes reversibly destabilize the ribosomal DNA array and leads to massive intrachromosomal rDNA locus expansionHistone humanization disrupts rDNA silencing and leads to nucleolar fragmentation 

Organisms exhibit extensive variation in ecological niche breadth, from very narrow (specialists) to very broad (generalists). Two general paradigms have been proposed to explain this variation: trade-offs between performance efficiency and breadth; and the joint influence of extrinsic (environmental) and intrinsic (genomic) factors. We assembled genomic, metabolic, and ecological data from nearly all known species of the ancient fungal subphylum Saccharomycotina (1,154 yeast strains from 1,051 species), grown in 24 different environmental conditions, to examine niche breadth evolution. We found that large differences in the breadth of carbon utilization traits between yeasts stem from intrinsic differences in genes encoding specific metabolic pathways, but limited evidence for trade-offs. These comprehensive data argue that intrinsic factors shape niche breadth variation in microbes. 

The nucleolus is the most prominent membraneless compartment within the nucleus—dedicated to the metabolism of ribosomal RNA. Nucleoli are composed of hundreds of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) repeated genes that form large chromosomal clusters, whose high recombination rates can cause nucleolar dysfunction and promote genome instability. Intriguingly, the evolving architecture of eukaryotic genomes appears to have favored two strategic rDNA locations—where a single locus per chromosome is situated either near the centromere (CEN) or the telomere. Here, we deployed an innovative genome engineering approach to cut and paste to an ectopic chromosomal location—the ~1.5 mega-base rDNA locus in a single step using CRISPR technology. This “megablock” rDNA engineering was performed in a fused-karyotype strain ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae. The strategic repositioning of this locus within the megachromosome allowed experimentally mimicking and monitoring the outcome of an rDNA migratory event, in which twin rDNA loci coexist on the same chromosomal arm. We showed that the twin-rDNA yeast readily adapts, exhibiting wild-type growth and maintaining rRNA homeostasis, and that the twin loci form a single nucleolus throughout the cell cycle. Unexpectedly, the size of each rDNA array appears to depend on its position relative to theCEN, in that the locus that isCEN-distal undergoes size reduction at a higher frequency compared to theCEN-proximal counterpart. Finally, we provided molecular evidence supporting a mechanism called paralogouscis-rDNA interference, which potentially explains why placing two identical repeated arrays on the same chromosome may negatively affect their function and structural stability.